View Single Post
Old 21-09-2012, 12:45 PM #16
Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex View Post
I'm talking about adopting period. sexuality is irrelevant. I'm looking at the bigger picture. Adoption, surrogacy, procreation in general. The conversation has obviously evolved. Do try to keep up.
Talking of keeping up... and of procreation - without which there would be no adoptions etc.

Quote:
Flaw in your rationale here: without the need for others to 'spread their genes'.... there would be no children to adopt - for anyone
How do you propose that adoptees are made available if people don't want to spread their genes (even via test tubes....you still need the raw material).

Sexuality is VERY relevant given the nature of the thread.

Last edited by Pyramid*; 21-09-2012 at 12:46 PM.
Pyramid* is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote