[AnnieK]

[QUOTE=lostalex;5498959]children from IVF would be just as adoptable, so i don't know what you are talking about.

i said, at puberty, sperm and eggs would be taken from everyone, i think i forgot to then mention that everyone would then be sterilized after that. Everyone would be sterilized in the same way we all get polio vaccines. So everyone would be adopting. It would be impossible for anyone to procreate through sex. That was probably an important detail i left out.

But yea, all people would be incapable of having children through intercourse, and everyone would have to APPLY to adopt through that government agency, and only the most qualified people would be allowed to raise the next generation of children. The WHOLE POINT being that only qualified capable parents would be



Nothing gives anyone the right to take away a person's right to bear children....especially the government - who would deem that people are qualified enough? This is life - not a film.....

The problem with the IVF procedures and advancements is that Mother Nature is very advanced in determining viable pregnancies and IVF procedures do not recognise this therefore increasing birth defects, women would have to have hormone treatments to produce eggs as we only produce one a month naturally (these hormone drugs increase the risks of numerous cancers) plus who would foot the expense of all these IVF cycles. IVF also has a massive failure rate.

Also what about diseases etc that require certain treatments that can be sourced from immediate family members - bone marrow etc? If no-one carries their biological children this makes finding donors much harder