Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
Nah. still don't 'buy it'.
Perhaps the reason all these folk kept 'schtoom'.... was because their were PAID to keep schtoom.......... stranger things have happened in life. and it is SO VERY EASY to lay the blame on one party, having cashed the cheque, having banked the money: when the offending party is dead, making food for the worms and cannot defend themselves.
If those that were abused felt to bad about it: why keep their mouths shut unti the man died? Possibly: just possibly: becuase they were paid to keep their mouths shut, but Mr JS isn't here to prove that?
there's a little thought for you....................
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah
Who paid them?
Let's have proof of THAT allegation ..... 
Any link with tangible evidence will do .....  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah
|
Patience is a virtue, I knew if folk waited long enough, there would be some admission of some alleged victims keeping their mouths shut because they accepted the price they paid.
Here, I provide you with the proof that you asked 400 odd post or so back.... ironic that you actually have provided the 'proof' yourself though.
A bribe doesn't work on it's own. It takes as least two to turn an 'offer' into a accepted bribe.
'Microscope' has provided very good reasoning for what may be far closer to the truth in all of this sordid saga.