Quote:
Originally Posted by waterhog
is it getting like China - 2 children, now close the vagina ? 26.10.12
thank you conservatives,
even if i am not your biggest fan,
i love the new policy,
the worms (sperm) will have to stay in the can.
i am the first to knock,
when the poor you harass,
but this idea,
is targeting immigration by the mass.
there is a culture,
even if my poem you don't read,
get a house and benefits,
all you have to do is breed.
there is expenses,
cheap is not contraception,
for a man and wife to use,
in some peoples eyes this is deception.
will this solve,
or is the policy novelty,
will the record population continue to boom,
even if children grow up in poverty.
i don't no,
but with the "cons" for once i am siding,
i am sick of the free lifestyle,
as our benefit system people are ridding.
( i am the first to knock the con party when they target the poor but i feel this new policy is just so correct. but what do you think and is it discrimination to people who want large family's and who have no money ?)
|
Surely if you do not have the means then to have a large family are you not then condemning your children to a life of relative poverty with problems from the word go. Is it not selfish to expect the state to pay for your large family, surely better to live and procreate within your means, at least it means the children you do have will have a larger share of the resources that are available to you and so may have a better chance of making a success of themselves.
I don't think anyone is trying to discriminate against poor people having large families, more they are saying that the state will not just provide a blank cheque book for these people.