Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks
Why would they be prosecuting her for slander if she was?
She is a known liar.
She lied about her boss to deflect attention away from her and her then boyfriend.
|
No. She "lied" about her boss because the brutal Italian police were Beating her until she agreed that her boss was guilty. It was the Italian Police that suspected her boss, and they tortured her for 10 hours including both mental and physical abuse until she finally agreed with their scenario. Then when it was proven that her boss was innocent, to save face, they claimed that it was her who was lying, when it fact it was the italian cops all along who forced her to point the finger at her boss.
Why did it take 10 hours of interrogation before she pointed the finger at her boss? If she was going to lie, why didn't she point the finger at him right away? If she had a plot to point the finger at her boss why did it take 10 hours of police torture before she pointed the finger at her boss? It's because the police wanted her to say it was her bioss, and they beat her until she said what they wanted her to say.
I've followed the entire case closely, and there is not a single shred of evidence that points to Amanda or Raffaele in the murder at all.
The man that is guilty of killing Meredith is already in jail serving 16 years for her murder. His name is Rudy Guede.
Why is it that Rudy Guede's finger prints were all over the entire crime scene , but Amanda or Raffaele's finger prints were nowhere to be found? Can you explain how someone can only erase their own fingerprints, and still leave thousands of finger prints by Rudy Guede? It makes no sense.