View Single Post
Old 22-03-2013, 01:06 PM #3
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,900


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,900


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
Its being brought in specifically for the most problematic families, where it is felt the benefits are simply not reaching the children, who are suffering malnutrition and a lifetime of poor health as well as being surrounded by smoking, booze dependency, drugs, workless families and all the social problems that come with that. This is aimed at assisting 120,000 families. It is essential for several reasons, mainly to try and improve the lives of tens of thousands of children who do not get fed and clothed properly, who suffer from malnutrition , smoke inhallation, which leads to addiction, chest problems, diabetes, behavioural issues etc etc

I am not interested in the anger of the parents, my concern here is purely to ensure child benefits reach the children. the fact these angry parents tell us they look after their children is not good enough. it is the children themselves who deserve a voice and deserve a chance for a better life.

as in the NHS we have this upside down for the past 15 years. we only ask the staff for their opinions yet ignore the patients, in this case we only ask the parents (because they are voters) and we ignore the children 9theyre the vulnerable ones who suffer and are powerless to change their situation)

we must change this false culture and serve the people we are meant to help...i.e the sick , the disabled, the children and the vulnerable.
To begin with.

If this happens, it wont be long before its extended to all benefits.
Vicky. is offline