Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
If the ******ing arseholes really think cost is a problem - then stop sh*tting out a dozen Celebrity series a year, and play it the way Channel 4 did.
It's a fact - more people would rather have live feed for an entire summer, than 3 weeks of watching Andrew Stone dancing & Natalie Cassidy rubbing beans over her tits.
They infuriate me so much it's unreal. I don't even care - if they go back on this now and decide it's much more beneficial to shove another Celebrity series down our throats, than give us Live Streaming, then they can go ****** themselves. I'll be watching BB USA instead.
Oh and another thing - in terms of cost, do they really think we're thick?
It costs next to nothing to set up a simple feed on their website that can stream from the cameras in the house. The feed is already there. The producers have it in their studio, we see it in the background on BOTS.
All that fat prick Ian from 'The Sweaty Box' needs to do, is flick a wire in the right place - and there we have it.
Absolute morons, they are. I swear.
|
I would think the cost would be more to do with having to hire a load of workers to constantly sit and monitor the feed 24hrs per day then dub out anything they don't want broadcast within the 15 minute delay.