[Jack_]

I wouldn't mind the money grabbing if the things people were asked to vote on and the way in which they were asked to vote were actually ****ing worthwhile and beneficial to the show

The first week - asking the public (let me just reiterate that...THE PUBLIC FFS) to nominate three housemates. Diabolical. And instead of just having a normal phone vote which would've been less dubious, they have some mobile shortcode vote where the numbers can only be found online...well if you're going to make people go to the website how about just making it a poll instead?

Then of course the change in voting system which I'm not even going to get into again. But it's awful.

And then these pairing up housemate votes...what's all that about? What happened to us deciding who should be paired up? Why are production now deciding for us who would make the best pairs? What was wrong with a normal vote and then the two with the most go into the Safe House? And if the lines are only going to be open for like 14 hours you may as well make that an online poll.

Perhaps if they changed the format slightly to let the public have control but in a way that benefited the show more then it'd be better. You know...have a HoH comp, they nominate two people, housemates nominate as normal, person with the most joins the other two nominees, the public then vote to SAVE (yes, you know that better voting system) one, and the housemates that aren't the two nominees vote to EVICT one of the other two left.