View Single Post
Old 17-07-2013, 06:50 PM #136
Eva bee Eva bee is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4
Eva bee Eva bee is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4
Default Daley v Hazel - complaint to Ofcom and Channel 5!

The show has evicted a contestant (Daley Ojuderie) for 'aggressive and threatening behaviour' towards Hazel O'Sullivan.
Many viewers are concerned that the show has acted unfairly as they have NOT evicted Hazel for pulling down Daley's underwear, and exposing his genitals to the cameras.
We are concerned that the actions of the program were unfair, sexist and racist! We believe that should Daley had done the same to Hazel he would have not only been removed from the program, but would have most definitely been arrested as well. In any case, if ANY male had done this to ANY female housemate, he would have without a doubt been removed from the program! We cannot understand exactly why Hazel has got away with only a warning. We believe the colour of Daley's skin and his gender has played a great part in all of this. It is the opinion of many that Hazel O'Sullivan should be removed from the program. We are not condoning Daley 's actions, but wholeheartedly believe that they should have BOTH been removed from the program. Both acted irresponsibly, both are at fault, so why was only ONE removed???
IF DALEY HAD DONE THIS TO HAZEL, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT!!! HAZEL PUT HER HANDS AROUND DALEY'S THROAT FIRST!!!SHE TORMENTED, TEASED AND PROVOKED HIM! WHY IS SHE GETTING AWAY WITH A 'WARNING'?!
WHY WERE THEY 'CHOSEN' FOR THE SAFE HOUSE???!
WHY, IF SHE WERE 'THREATENED', WERE THEY *ALLOWED TO SPEND ANOTHER NIGHT TOGETHER???!!
WHAT IS THIS REALLY ALL ABOUT CHANNEL 5??? WE NEED ANSWERS

!!!
Sent from my iPad
Eva bee is offline