View Single Post
Old 29-01-2007, 06:14 PM #4
The_Hitman The_Hitman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Big Acc
Posts: 1,273
The_Hitman The_Hitman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Big Acc
Posts: 1,273
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sticks
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Hitman
No Sticks, I had a pet emu who died of starvation when i forgot to feed her cause I was writing a response to one of your ridiculous posts defending those indefensable idiots in the past few weeks. Her name was Linda, she was the first death from big brother, and you are the main culprit. I hope youre proud.
So anyone who posts a viewpoint at variance to yours is ridiculous.

Are those who have been in the house ridiculous because they have said there was no racism?

wrt Jo, I have commented about how she seemed to use the old maxim about attack being the best form of defence, but apart from that I have not put a defence for what she may or may not have done. I started my variant thread, now merged with another, because on the general point reality TV has been pushing the envelope more and more, and it is only a matter of time before there is some trajedy. Remember how they rubbed Big G's nose into the Helen and Paul affair by bringing in the dinners for two?

My question is has this day come, when the victim may have died as an indirect result.

Jo was absent last night, and this morning we learned her agent had died. Suppose you had been on the show and had not acted in the manner that for argument's sake Jo in your eyes did. You had been squeaky clean. Now suppose just before the final, your agent of long standing had died. Would you feel like appearing?

I just suggested a reason that this may have been a factor, it was not meant to be a total endorsement of Jo and what she is accused of doing.

I take on the role of the equivalent of a barrister or an attorney for housemates that experience periods of unpopularity, because of the hue and cry and lots of people dive in to rip them to shreds. In a real court a defendant is entitled to representation irriespective of who they are or what they are accused of

People forget the other maxim from time to time, "Let he who is without sin, throw the first stone" I am here to show that there may be an alternate viewpoint, and things may not be what they seem.

Why is that ridiculous?
Yeah well thats all well and good Sticky, but tell that to Linda's eggs. Who's going to come and sit on them eggs to keep em warm. Forgive me for assuming, but I fear your big wobbly bum would do more harm than good. You see what I mean. Things have a knock on effect. Jo was a bitch, so now you want to come and squash these poor eggs. Its not worth it Sticks, it really isnt lad.
The_Hitman is offline