Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
Annie was commenting on the issue. She was agreeing with me that your use of the word 'grooming' was at worst spurious and at best an assumption. The word appears nowhere in the article on page 1, and neither have I seen it used anywhere in connection with this case, apart from in your post.
And no, let's not go round and round because you've already got way off the point. I've said all I have to say anyway, so anything further you want to add, I will refer you to my previous posts.
|
Annie was agreeing with you yes, unfortunately I disagree with your interpretation of my post.
I have explained my reasoning for using the word grooming and that stands.
Never once did I suggest it was in any text relating to the case you are again misquoting me livia.
For the last time I used the cases of the grooming in Oxford as a comparison only.
To bring it back to the point let's see what the opinion of the PM is...
''David Cameron had condemned a prosecution barrister and had urged the courts to ‘stand up for victims’ after Neil Wilson, 41, escaped jail despite luring the girl to his home, where she performed a sex act on him.
'It isn’t appropriate. We need a criminal justice system that stands up properly for victims. The victims should always be at the centre of our thinking.
‘The CPS themselves have said that this isn’t appropriate, the Attorney General is going to look into the case and we need a system that properly stands up for victims.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oids-jail.html