Quote:
Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard
LMAO! Couldn't be arsed...... for probably tens of thousands?  Oh come on! Sam would just need to get a 'no win - no fee' lawyer and he could be quids in.
What about the publican quoted? Have the DS lied about what he said? If so, he too could take libel action.
Sorry but there is only one conclusion: it may be in the Daily Star but there is no way that rag's lawyers would let an article like this be printed if it wasn't provable. |
So then maybe Sam will get a no win no fee lawyer or maybe he won't. What the **** does it have to do with me? You asked me I responded in the manner I saw fit.
Why don't you persue this for your own gratification? Don't forget to get Sam's version of the story as well though, you know to be fair and all that. You have to wait though as he's currently in the BB house as you know. But because of this smear campaign (which may or may not be 100% true and full of accurate facts) you just may not have to wait too much longer.
In this world there are journalists and then there are twonks who think they are journalists because they ask a couple of questions, get a couple of names and then stretch the truth to fit their needs at the time and pay off the victim once the newpaper or magazine reaps the profits.