|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566
Favourites:
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566
Favourites:
|
People saying BB is not a social experiment anymore
Its due to the public.
The public truly have it in for BB and are often just waiting for an excuse to complain.
A social experiment is leaving the housemates talk about controvercial issues such as race, sexual orientation, religion, homophobia, sexism.....
Back in the day BB would only interfere if it got to out of hand, not froma simple comment.
Take BB1 Nasty Nick he wasn't even given a warning for saying gays were the same as child molesters instead Big Brother left it to the housemates to totally own him making him look the fool and Anna who dominated the debate even got an invite to George Michaels house as a thanks.
Its now 2013 and the housemates are no longer allowed to do this.
BB should not interfere unless it gets to the point that person is feeling intimidated or is becoming totally offensive to viewers.
In 13 years you would think times would move on but unfortunately people seem to love targeting BB.
Charlotte pisses herself and ****s on Geordie Shore but its seen as ok.
I think the public are the ones losing out because if housemates were left to discuss proper issues and allowed to discuss their opinions then that gets people talking about it in society aswel.
BB opened the doors for it to be ok to ask taboo questions when out with a group of people but now its broken we are all treading on egg shells.
BB broke the mold but is now under the constant eye of Ofcom.
Kind of ironic.
BB is no longer watching you its them who are currently being watched 24/7.
Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 25-08-2013 at 11:12 PM.
|