View Single Post
Old 26-08-2013, 12:32 PM #16
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahopkins View Post
I don't think Big Brother was ever a social experiment. It was signed up by Channel 4 producers who knew that they could get a cheap TV programme that can fill up a chunk of the schedule and getting insanely high TV ratings.
This isn't criticising Big Brother. I'm saying that it is a stroke of genius!

If it was a real social experiment then it would go on for a year like the original idea, there would be no highlights episodes that just happen to be in prime time slots, No spin-off shows. No eviction, no host, No voting. You get the point!
That's why they broadcast it at 11pm?

They didn't know how big ther show was going to be.

The 1st BB is in every way a social experiment.....Did you watch it?
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote