Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus.
I really didn't want to quote you here, but as you've indirectly quoted me, then I sort of have to really. Your post above seems reasonable enough. Just personal opinion no advancement of your own views, etc etc.
Lets ask Kizzy from the previous page what she thinks about the evidence:
Right, so the links in this thread are not meant to prove anything, but they are evidence, and not heresay?
Well that's wrong as well. Just by picking apart one piece of the facts on display from those links, which is easily done with the dogs, for example, then the whole thing is called into question. They aren't facts. It's an internet trolling group that get together to hound the McCanns, because they are convinced of their guilt. Chuff has made that perfectly clear in this thread already. When you click the links, they aren't people who are just throwing interesting things about the case into the public arena for s**ts and giggles, they're doing it to try and provide "evidence" for the guilt of the McCanns
Witness statements are notoriously unreliable because of the way the human brain works to recall information, and especially in times of great stress. There are no solid facts to be found in this case other than a child is missing, that's it. So speculating about photo's and the grieving process with hints and double entendre is really neither here nor there.
|
I am reasonable, all my responses have been rational and reasoned.
The links provided by both chuff and josy have provided factual information on witness statements, whether or not you choose to accept that or not is your choice, nobody else is forced to take your interpretation are they?
Reading as much information as you can and staying objective is key I think.