Quote:
Originally posted by rex3
Al Jazeera English, when the BBC means its watered down it means, the target audience is people who have never seen agreesive wars and explosions monthly across the street.
Leaders, from Saddam, to Saudi Arabian Kings, to Bush dislike Al Jazeera, becuase it shows bad point about every single issue. Just becuase it took a non-western oil rich country to pluck up the couriage, doesnt mean its going to be biased, this is where the west and other places differ.
I repeat people from Saddam to Bush both sides of the end hated Al Jazeera for exploting and potraying to the world that no-goods, so how can you label it a biased network.
i can understand why the BBC(guess who owns it, with what war is going on) would say it is.
|
i'll repeat the above.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lauren
Al Jazeera England is a biased version of Al Jazeera - in my opinion. (I don't think the BBC has said anything about it?).
Sky used to show the original arabic Al Jazeera until around 2006 when suddenly they changed it to Al Jazeera England that unlike it's previous channel - showed a biased perspective and didn't portray realistic events in the arab world because the Western World are blind to the damage they're doing to other countries.
|
Well if thats your opinion, your entitled to it. The BBC's has said things about it. And can we not turn this into a society or racial or religious thing, or the "Them vee us!!!" becuase im not.
I really dont think you've seen Al-Jazeera English's programmes, have you seen "The Listening Post" it critises both ends, of the media, and "Inside Iraq" critises actions from both ends. There journalism is far. far more liberated than the BBC and ESPECIALLY FOX!! Its won numerous International AWARDS. Unlike the BBC where it has BEEN INTERNATIONALLY CRITISED FOR ITS BIASED ISSUE WITH PALESTINE!!!
so ... its your opinion anyway