Quote:
Originally posted by Sophii3x
Quote:
Originally posted by Psylocke
Quote:
Originally posted by Sophii3x
Quote:
Originally posted by Psylocke
The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.
There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.
|
So US and UK orphans shouldn't be adopted because they have a lower chance of dying than those from poor countries.
I just don't agree with celebrities traveling to poor countries and picking kids.
|
Yes,the child who is in risk of dying should be priority.
If Celebs or anyone dosent travel to poor countrys to help those kids noone will and they will die.
|
But you can't stop a child dying. Haven't you heared that every 3 seconds a child in Affrica dies? It's soo sad, but true.
I just think it's wrong that these people take these babies/children away from their families.
|
Angelinas babies
Maddox- was ophaned in war,he had no Family and was in an ophanagein Cambodia that he would have stayed untill he was old enough to be thrown out onto the streets,He was not going to have a happy ending,probably thrown into child prostitution and even worse
Zahara-From Ethiopia was Oprpaned by AIDS,she had no family,she was serverly undernourished six-month-old girl . Shortly after they returned to the United States Zahara had to spend time in a hospital for dehydration and malnutrition. Jolie stated that "she was six months and not nine pounds. Her skin, you could squeeze it, it stuck together.
That baby was going to die.
Im glad Angelina had the money and sence to save those two lifes.
Yes a baby dies every 3 secs,but that dosent mean people should give up and doom them all.