Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
Yes, I do have to admire your honesty LOL...
I think it makes the mods job harder as the rules are quite wordy, one seems to cancel out another, they're mostly up for conjecture and there's no appeal anymore. The rules could be edited down to a set of bullet points really. I think if there was a review - not by mods or members, by admin - and a proper system of appeal was set, it would make the mods' job clearer, there'd be fewer arguments over warnings and infractions and less abuse of the appeals system. Just my personal opinion of course...
|
Been asking for a while for a change in the system but it doesnt seem like its happening. Would make everything so much easier, and more clear for members too. I know the rules are hard to understand at times. And it doesn't really help that there are only set infractions for certain rulebreaks, for others we have to use our discretion, which is where the 'bias' thing comes in as some mods ARE harsher than others..an if someone gets an infraction from one person for the same thing that someone else got one from someone else..well they could end up with totally different amounts, if that makes sense :S
Appeals was absolutely perfect (the appeals section was actually my idea to begin with) to begin with, until people started going there for EVERY little thing. I think it would probably have been better to just ban certain users from the section than remove it totally, but even doing that would have caused world war 3
