Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
If they had given him a formal warning, they would have aired it...as they always do with every other one. There'd be no reason for them to cut off before they give him the formal warning, that doesn't even make any sense.
NO HE WASN'T WARNED  please someone tell me I'm not the only one getting pissed off with this now?
Have you ever even watched Big Brother before? In the past year we have had countless formal warnings handed out that it really shouldn't be hard for any Big Brother fan to recall the terminology that the producers recite when handing one out to a housemate, and when they merely just remind them of the rules that they were given before they entered. I mean seriously?
If it's a formal warning, they say 'and therefore Big Brother is left with no choice but to issue you with a formal warning, any more action like this may lead to your removal from the Big Brother house'. They didn't say this to Evander, the transcript says as much and so does the clip. Watch it back. In fact, watch Jemima's racist warning back, watch Hazel's Daley-gate warning back, watch Gina's warning back, watch Dexter's warning back. It's the same sentence. Every. Single. Time.
This was a reminder of the rules, NOT a formal warning. You are just wrong and you seriously need to remind yourself of what is deemed a formal warning on this show. |
Give it a rest Jack. we didn't see Jay getting warned and conors warning wasn't aired either. admit defeat and go to bed.