View Single Post
Old 22-01-2014, 01:12 PM #12
vikram84 vikram84 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 35
vikram84 vikram84 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salman! View Post
he had the wine, so there was no reason for him to bring anything up considering he was guilty himself. instead though he chose to specifically mention the brandy that Linda had, no mention of the wine. so clearly he was trying to turn housemates against Linda yet again. how can he justified? Loved how Linda shut Jim up and embarrassed him in front of everyone, he was asking for it

ugh he's SO VILE.
Explain to me how he could he possibly turn the housemates against Linda by saying they received cherry brandys but they did not drink them. Please only come at me with intelligent and logical reasons and not emotional drivel.
vikram84 is offline