View Single Post
Old 26-01-2014, 01:17 AM #35
Videostar's Avatar
Videostar Videostar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Frank Carson's Dressing Room
Posts: 4,335

Favourites (more):
BB16: Marc
BB15: Chris
Videostar Videostar is offline
Senior Member
Videostar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Frank Carson's Dressing Room
Posts: 4,335

Favourites (more):
BB16: Marc
BB15: Chris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
They can think whatever they want and quite frankly I don't see why anyone cares, as I've addressed in other threads any viewer that will let a presenter or spin-off show dictate what their opinions or who their favourites are shouldn't be let anywhere near a television



I'm not denying the actual show itself is biased - as in the producers - but then I've actively encouraged that before anyway (since the voters can't be trusted to keep the show interesting)
I agree with the first part of your post.

But why encourage a show that is biased? that show is meant to let the celeb panellists have their opinions and the studio audience but not the actual presenters and the professionals who are meant to be assessing the HM's behaviour and the events in the house in a fair minded and genuine way? no way was lastnights hero worship of Linda fair minded.

You say it's ok for the show to be biased because the voters can't be trusted to keep the show interesting, but most HM's that the biased BBBOTS show and the presenters tend to be liking and very much favouring are the boring HM's...Sam BB14, this celeb BB's Sam, Ollie and so on, but yes, it is upto the BB fans to be strong minded enough to not allow themselves to be suckered in by the bias, but that doesn't mean it's right for the producers to try and influence us.

Last edited by Videostar; 26-01-2014 at 01:18 AM.
Videostar is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote