Quote:
Originally Posted by Videostar
I agree with the first part of your post.
But why encourage a show that is biased? that show is meant to let the celeb panellists have their opinions and the studio audience but not the actual presenters and the professionals who are meant to be assessing the HM's behaviour and the events in the house in a fair minded and genuine way? no way was lastnights hero worship of Linda fair minded.
You say it's ok for the show to be biased because the voters can't be trusted to keep the show interesting, but most HM's that the biased BBBOTS show and the presenters tend to be liking and very much favouring are the boring HM's...Sam BB14, this celeb BB's Sam, Ollie and so on, but yes, it is upto the BB fans to be strong minded enough to not allow themselves to be suckered in by the bias, but that doesn't mean it's right for the producers to try and influence us.
|
You've completely misunderstood my post.
I said that the actual show itself, as in Big Brother, the main show, the production team of the main show - can be and have on occasion been biased, i.e engineered twists to keep certain housemates in (see: Speidi), but I actively encourage that because thus far it's been for housemates that are integral to a particular series, and the voters can't be trusted to keep them in. So long as
that particular bias is towards the right housemates - I don't really mind.
I was on about the main show. BOTS itself is not biased, on that I disagree.