Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
Please see the thread I made the other night for details on how BOTS isn't biased
As I pointed out then, it is funny how people only accuse it of being biased when it's their favourites that are being criticised (and I say that as someone that's a fan of Jim) but couldn't care less if not
It's a debate show, if everyone on the panel and audience dislikes a certain housemate, that's their prerogative.
|
I can take that on board Jack however I see it a bit differently.
I do think if they are bothering to have a panel then get a cross section of opinion each time as to housemates, not those who just want to use it to have a go at a housemate like that daft woman next to Linda.
In all honesty I found last night show on botp to just be a support mechanism for Linda.
If you had conflicting views as to the housemates across the board then that would make for a more lively and balanced panel.
The daft Annie Lennox lookalike,(I cannot see it myself,poor Annie Lennox), was asked a simple question, who do you think will win, her answer and she is an invited panelist was, ''My winner is here next to me''. namely Linda.
For goodness sake, where do they dig these ridiculous people up from, Linda is her winner, Linda has just attracted the lowest number of votes to save in a 5 way eviction battle.
The whole show was in my opinion just a get at Jim exercise and make Linda feel better,the programme should not be about that,it should 'reflect' a little at least of reasoned cross section opinion as to the housemates.
Bias can spoil a programme if it is too blatant as it did last year when Emma was far and away more supporting Daley against Hazel.