View Single Post
Old 29-01-2014, 10:49 AM #61
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


daniel-lewis-1985 daniel-lewis-1985 is offline
Senior Member
daniel-lewis-1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 16,566

Favourites:
BB16: Sarah


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
You state the theory but you wont back it up with jim? why? theres no evidence of him being a sexist pig in the house, so by your own definition its wrong to label him a sexist pig. if you dont agree with that they youre totally and utterly contradicting your own theory. which is frankly embarassing
You obviously didn't read my last post thoroughly as I did mention Jim and every person in general, even peoples comments on the forum.

"When I say everyone I mean accusations against Jim aswell as other housemates, people in general and the rest of the world.
"


Im right in saying its wrong to label someone without proof do you not agree?

Dont be so rude and call my posts embarrassing, we both have the same opinion on the belief its wrong to label someone something when there is nothing to prove their allegation.

Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 29-01-2014 at 10:51 AM.
daniel-lewis-1985 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote