|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 2,588
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 2,588
|
Quote:
Originally posted by GiRTh
Quote:
Originally posted by nodisharmony
Hi GiRTh,
The quote:- "There was a lot to cover" was out of a paragraph.
I would never just say that! All the info to that quote, will be within the paragraph from which it was taken.
Everything else should be self explanatory.
______________________________________________
What style of writing? Am I mimicking??
I don't cut & paste, unless it's from an article in a Newspaper.
It would be impossible to do this, as I don't know what question I am going to be asked.
It's not my style and never has been.
______________________________________________
You say, "Racial-Undertones?" I would say that it is "Racial-Overtones", not that important really!! (The wording, that is)
I am not interested in debating racism on a separate thread really. It is more interesting and vital too, to debate CBB Jan. and what happened in there and the aftermath of the show.
This is no longer a game. It is real life and these three girl's need real help and real understanding.
______________________________________________
You ask me:- "Why do you think that racist and sexist remarks should be bird-whistled out?"
The answer is simple,
If Endemol's editors have watched a segment of the show, where a couple of housemates are saying offensive remarks in a conversation, which would probably be heated, or, behind that person's back.
Then, it would be a very clear and consise decision by the editors, to decide which words and comments need editing out.
There are other factors to consider too:-
1) Are these words or comments within a private & personal conversation between two housemates, whereby, they may be talking about somebody who is not a house-mate, but is just their opinion, in the form of "gossip".
These comments cannot be proven necassarily, but, it is not something that Big Brother really wants to make public.
It is better to edit it all out.
If, during that conversation, a racial or sexual sounding remark was there, then it would be a prudent judgement to remove that remark, within that particular conversation.
2) The words or comments may be right in the middle of a big fall-out, just like with the Shilpa vs the three girl's incident.
If these words or comments, were within this big fall-out, then it may be deemed a good judgement call, to keep certain parts or words in, for all of us to see and hear?
I don't believe that is a good decision, with the Shilpa vs the girls incident, as it has caused such concern and offence.
But, I am not the one, making those judgement calls.
3) The words or comments are within a big argument, just like the Jade-Goody vs Shilpa argument, where Jo & Danielle were all instrumental in.
Within this case, once again, it would be better to look at each and every word and if there was something really bad, then it is a prudent decision for the editors to make in that circumstance, and edit-out.
Profits & ratings could rise, but keeping the argument interesting.
Davina McCall said that the argument was un-cut.
I would have still prefered more editing, especially where tempers were flaring and words could have been birdwistled for a less offensive view of the argument.
4) The words or comments are totally on there own and not part of anything, just in the spare of the moment.
Definate editing out and perhaps a warning in the Diary Room, or total expulsion from the BB house.
The Endemol editors are the police in the house and have to make the right judgement call at the right time.
______________________________________________
You ask me:- "Why should the show protect them, if they act foolish?"
It comes down to (how foolish) and other stuff, which you already know
All the best, nodisharmony 
|
I can't be bothered anymore. I think your views are blinkered to the point of being prejudiced, but you never say anything other than we may not know the truth. Try and make your posts shorter; I can't be bothered to read acres of waffle to find the only point you make. You're not convincing anybody on this forum who already disagreed with you and it's noticeable that the Jade fans on the forum are not springing to your aid. Ask yourself why? This has become very boring either make a point or don't bother posting.
|
If you want shorter posts GiRTh, then, ask one question at a time. That minimises the so-called "Waffling".
p/s, I'm not on here to make you happy, by the way!!!!!!
_________________________________________
The Jade Goody fans on this forum amount to about "5", I think? That is including me as well.
If they don't get involved, then it is one of two reasons:-
1) They enjoy taking part in other topics in other sections of this Big Brother forum and prefer to keep friendly with everyone, even the Jade-Haters, who may want to talk about something else as well as Jade Goody.
2) They look in at what I say, with interest and are quite happy to let my good work continue in my usual way.
Putting some Jade-Haters in a difficult position, by them, not being able to come up with a reasoned response with the prosecution, against Jade, Jo & Danielle.
nodisharmony
|