View Single Post
Old 26-02-2014, 07:10 PM #22
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josy View Post
Well it's a big issue to some members Jack, a few have commented about feeling uncomfortable lately with some of the conversations that have been going on, I'm not saying that no one should mention sex on the forum that would be ridiculous but theres a place for graphic sexual discussion and it's not on a bb forum with members as young as 13 years old, and it doesn't matter how or what they know I still don't think their parents would be happy to find out they had been involved in sexual discussions online with people sometimes more than double their age.
Well my answer to those that are uncomfortable with such threads would be...don't open them, and those who create them should place a graphic content warning in the title just to be fair. But I guess that's a more acceptable and understandable reason to ban them than age - which is definitely not. I don't think any 13 year olds on here have been 'involved' in any sexual discussions, probably just read them...and if you went into any Year 8/Year 9 class in a high school in anywhere across the UK you would hear much, much worse conversations than are being had on this forum, believe me. 13 year olds aren't stupid, or innocent.

Also, if parents are really that concerned at that age - then they should be monitoring their online activity and actually should be wondering why they want to be talking to a load of 20/30 year olds on a forum anyway. It isn't this forums job to parent a load of under 16's.
Jack_ is offline