View Single Post
Old 19-03-2014, 09:40 PM #31
smeagol's Avatar
smeagol smeagol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: in the swamps of middle earth
Posts: 12,358

Favourites:
BB14: Dexter
BB13: Deana
smeagol smeagol is offline
Senior Member
smeagol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: in the swamps of middle earth
Posts: 12,358

Favourites:
BB14: Dexter
BB13: Deana
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
I sort of agree: whacking a tax on sugar (and sweetener, let's not have them getting around it by using more and more cancspartame) would surely rake in an absolute fortune. And it's a "fairer" tax than most - if you don't want to pay it, buy fresh ingredients and cook / eat properly. They could also whack a tax on anything that features ingredients with more than four syllables. I'm looking at YOU, monosodium glutamate. And of course, a 50% tax on anything with the word "hydrogenated" in it.

Rake in junk food cash, save the NHS a fortune. A flawless plan.
junk food and sweets are so cheap now. and if people cant smoke or drink or watch the bbc all they can do is eat and do the bingo lol
__________________
smeagol is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote