View Single Post
Old 02-05-2007, 10:54 PM #10
nodisharmony nodisharmony is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 2,588
nodisharmony nodisharmony is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spacebandit
Quote:
Originally posted by nodisharmony
Quote:
Originally posted by spacebandit
Quote:
Originally posted by Markus™
She's hardly going to go on EVERY reality show and gain the publics affection. Especially in Britain.
Not when the American networks will pay more, I highly doubt she gives a monkeys what the public think as long as the price is right

After Paul McCartney spat her out, she is anxiously awaiting some nice free cash, which she will get.

It is always the way when the saying, "Love is Blind", comes into play. Even more when kids are involved.

Bye, Bye, kids, money and control in that department.

Anyway, regarding the article. Heather has a few prostetic limbs, "one for each day", if she chooses.

This would possible cause a sympathy vote for a future CBB housemate, so her refusal is a great idea in that department. But, I am sure that Heather knows best.

She is very wealthy, like many past Celebrity house-mates that don't need the money, but still crave the limelight and publicity.

Remember critics of a particular housemate. MANY crave attention from the media spotlight, not the ONE and I am not quoting a comment between Captain Kirk and Mr Spock either, in case anyone is getting ideas?

Heather did do the US show "Dancing With The Stars"

She was dancing away quite well with her prostetic leg, even though Paul McCartney was seeing a different side to her, where she was apparently struggling to climb stairs, etc..

Must be lies..

The money-side of USA offers is neither-here-nor-there.



nodisharmony
More incomprehensible twaddle, once again in reply to me, and yet makes no sense whatsoever and as usual all but ignores the content of the the post it replies to.

I shall attempt to explain, in small words to assist you, the point you attempted to raise in the last part of your ramble.

In the context of my original comment which you utterly ignored, the money side of US offers is very much here and there.

British TV is a distant and poor relation to the cash that can be offered by a US network.

She would never do British CBB as, with the cash she has fleeced off of McCartney, they couldn't afford her by a long way. If a US network decided they wanted her on a US version of CBB for instance, that cash offer would far and away outstrip any offer that could be made in Britain.

To even attempt to deny that, even as an hypothetical example, by ignoring the core premise of US TV and the power of the $, shows that you are absolutely clueless about the reality of TV on Planet Earth.
Which does not suprise me in the slightest.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005379/bio

The above link will certainly guide any human being to look towards planet earth.

I certainly guarantee that his wealth is massive and his need for money is not great, however, his want for it could be different.

To ignore and to ramble is certainly in-tune with my feelings to a certain "socialthoughtness" that it is hard to place in catatonian words of non-understandique.

If you get the meaning?




nodisharmony
nodisharmony is offline