Quote:
Originally posted by Dr43%er
Quote:
The article said that the jury didn't believe her.
|
For once I agree with nodis. There is a huge difference between lying and not being believed.
A few months ago I was a witness in a sexual assault case at Leicester Crown court. I was the only witness to the assault. It was her word against his and then my evidence. I gave my evidence as to what I saw. He was guilty as hell of that there is no doubt, but he was found not guilty as the jury chose to believe him over mine and the accusers evidence. I did not lie though. Was a strange feeling knowing that if they thought he was innocent then they must have thought I was lying.
|
For twice you agree, "Harry Hill" remember?
Jade Goody doesn't bear grudges, like she has said before, but sometimes, on a rare occasion, people break rules and have lied but it was essential and that comment applies in two separate places and times
Being believed is one thing, but sometimes things can be taken out of context and over a thousand things can be narrowed down to about five and vicious lies and propaganda can follow and "Leicester" is very familiar.
Jade Goody knows the truth in this case and she has said what she has said.
She won on this occasion and winners are everywhere, some you know and some we don't.
nodisharmony