Quote:
Originally Posted by cfromhx02
BBOTS sshowed yet again that it asvoids mentioning any criticism of people it or it's audience don't want to croiticise last night. It showed clear bias in only croiticising Mark who's remaining 10k would have been shared amongst the remaining 7 whereas Chris was only going to share his money between himself Christopher & Ashleigh so five people wouldm't have got any.
Yet BBOTS failed & probably avoided mentioning that when clearly the way Chris would have shared the money is far more selfish & nasty.
So why not mention it ?
Every housemate is supposed to have the same amount of debate, they keep telling us that on BBOTS that they give everyone same amount of time,and that they're fair, but of course they are not.
So often they have tried to lead public opinion, and so often the public have been led and told what to think,who to like or dislike by so often using votes which hardly anyone has heard of,
never mentioning hypocritical points about Ashleigh, Chris etc never having any criticism or allowing any debate against them,
it's no wonder with such biased coverage of characters on BBOTS that the audience have been led to vote in the way they have.
|
There was a very biased BOTS a while back re Chris. I was totally disgusted with it. I would say that it was led by Master Steven Goode as he was on the panel with his usual negativity, I fear for his future. Everyone joined in there wasnt a good thing said about Chris. I think it was the one whereby Emma giggled and laughed at the fact that the CREEPY name had materialised in BOTS. They should be ashamed of themselves. Things have gone better since then but I think there has been some outside influence, not sure.....