View Single Post
Old 16-08-2014, 11:26 AM #34
anne666's Avatar
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
anne666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedusa View Post
This is a very sad situation but it was also a business deal which stated healthy babies for large amounts of money ie hundreds of thousands of dollars.

So the couple spending this money would not be looking to adopt a disabled or partially abled baby.



.
BIB. Where does it state that in any surrogacy agreement and the sum charged was 16,000 dollars not hundreds of thousands, which they still haven't fully paid. This isn't adoption in the traditional sense, the woman was carrying his own babies and that attitude stinks. He wanted everything his own way, it was too late to abort the downs baby, not that the surrogate would have and that is exactly what's caused this mess now. Did they even check what her stance was on abortion, no.
__________________

Last edited by anne666; 16-08-2014 at 11:28 AM.
anne666 is offline