But he did explain them in that bit you posted. He still chose to send out a bit of a crap tweet. Not conforming to explaining their views in a way that are unnecessarily embellished or wordy is one thing but wow, slow down Maurice.
You're kind of implying he was trapped by the character limit in certain moments. Now he was actually freed from having to go on a big long spiel about it. I'm confused. Which is it?
I've realized I'm using this as arsenal against his character more than any implied fascism of his material morality [because it can and all likelihood in a future society
will be as fascist in it's implications than any religious code of conduct that came before it. Or I read too much Philip K. Dick].
He is entitled to post whatever he likes of course. The argument - for whatever it is because it immediately became blown out of proportion by it's very nature and context -really just rests on where you put it on a scale of pharisaical crassness.
He obviously must have felt some of that sting himself because he did come out and make a half hearted apology. Why? Either he genuinely believes like I do that it was in poor taste or the vainglorious prat really is that quick to buckle and retract over a bit of backlash.
That he knew he was going to get. It's beyond silly and I've included myself in it
.