Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
No, that isn't what I'm saying at all, I'm saying he was speaking in his tweet as a scientist would, and as someone who extols the virtue of applying logical thought.
He expressed himself very well,nobody was in any doubt as to his stance were they?
Is this a debate that anyone could have in 140 characters?.. No.
He elaborated due to the perceived offence he caused.
|
His tweet ventured into "morality" which is as subjective and unscientific as it gets, to be honest.
The tweet was opinion based and not factual. Ergo; not science.