View Single Post
Old 09-11-2014, 03:47 PM #25
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swinearefine View Post
This thread makes me sad, more outrage @ this sexism please. It was misogynistic harassment, and people thinking it isn't only solidify the misogyny. It has nothing to do even do with the content of the messages, it is the fact that society allows men the belief that they have the right to ogle women in public, that women in public are open to men's views and desires, and that when women react negatively to this uninvited harassment they are bitches. The woman who made this video had closed-off body behavior which should make it clear to anyone with a brain that she isn't in the mood for this ****. And lmao @ people whining about men receiving similar treatment, bull****. People like to make things tit-for-tat, finding a way to turn sexism targeted at women into sexism targeted at men no matter the facts. I walked around the streets of downtown Manhattan for hours and hours (got lost oops) and looked FANTASTIC, like, I really had it going on that day, got zero catcalls from women or gay men. Meanwhile my aging mother in boring work clothes gets catcalled on the reg in a rural town of ~8,000 people when she walks down main street. And whether a catcall is deemed "creepy" or "complimentary," it is all creepy because it's patriarchal objectification of women. And this woman has got rape threats and so much sexist vitriol from this which just proves her point even more.
If you don't see that women (and the media) also objectify men, and fairly frequently, then you are part of the problem. Not the solution. The question that needs asking is, is it OK for a person - any person - to be objectified without consent. Which set of genitals someone happens to have is, or should be, completely irrelevant. THAT is equality.
user104658 is offline