Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
Why are you so hellbent on attempting to ram your point home to me? I have my view and you and your cockeyed perception of what you consider to be the correct version of events is inconsequential to me.
Just stop, I'm happy with the verdict and happen to think it was entirely correct thank you.
|
Because you keep replying to my posts with rather vague and circumstantial points that do not answer the main points of law needed to prove a rape case.
I understand you think he is a rapist and that he went out that night to rape a young women. He did not he went out that night to have a few laughs and maybe get off with a woman . Given his fame, money and good looks he probably has no trouble achieving this. However this time the situation resulted in him being convicted of raping a young women.
Did he force himself on her , maybe
Did she consent ? Maybe not but given all the points raised in my previous texts I cannot see how any jury can say beyond a reasonable that he did indeed rape her??
Fact is you cannot... But this jury thought they could and that I and many people on this forum find hard to understand.
Let's leave this thread alone now.... Neither of us have any more to add.
.