Quote:
Originally Posted by mazerunner_888
I am truly shocked by your view here. A woman has the right to artistic expression without that meaning any male meth addict then has the right to sexually abuse her. This is 2015 I think we should not go back to 1970s views of women.
|
No we should not and that is what I am saying. Girls like Chloe perpetuate the views of those times, causing men to see women as sex objects there to be touched. Unfortunately women like Chloe talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.
Hark at your use of the word artiistic - nothing Chloe does is artistic - just cheap and tawdry.
She made a humungus fuss about Jeremy touching/moving part of her dressing-gown when she was in a very safe enviroment. It a deliberate act for air time.
What about the poor victims who have actually been sexually abused by men who have been looking at tasteless pictures of girls like Chloe and got so worked up they went out and took what they wanted from someone who was not in a save enivonment and did not put themselves on display. Girls like Chloe are partly to blame for that.