View Single Post
Old 18-01-2015, 06:07 PM #10
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
I know about intelligence gathering and I'm aware of the processes involved. If intelligence shows that a particular group is at risk of attack then that group will be protected - as much as it is possible to protect them. To suggest that if another group is threatened they wouldn't be so concerned about level of protection because it isn't such a political hot potato is really a sweeping and erroneous indictment of our security services.
I'm not saying that they would be lax in their response / fail to protect Muslims. I'm suggesting that the level of response in this case might be disproportionate to the intelligence that has actually been received. We do of course know that there are different alert levels - I'm just saying it's possible that they might be artificially stepping up that level because of the potential fallout.

Again, I'm not saying I know this to be the case, because obviously us civvies are not given information detailed enough to make that call. I'm just saying it's feasible. And that Jews being threatened isn't any "sadder" than Muslim being threatened, if those being threatened are innocent. And let's not pretend that innocent Muslim people havent been attacked and threatened across Europe in the last week.
user104658 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote