Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
She was asked to pick the least entertaining and explain why but by her own admission she did neither.BB needs to man up and start putting some of these people straight.
I think by accident she may have chosen correctly as while I do not dislike Calum of the four now up he would be my choice to go based on comparative entertainment. I do not believe he is safe from this eviction so Katie P could come well unstuck. ?
|
Exactly, she was asked to replace Katie Hopkins with who 'she' considered to be the 'least entertaining housemate'.
To put up someone she believed to be so popular that they would not go was just plain ridiculous.
She should have been told that her reason for putting Calum up was not a valid one as to what she was instructed to do, as you pointed out.
I hate this swopping of who is up by another housemate anyway,make them do tasks then the winner be saved and likewise for those not up originally up for eviction, do tasks for them too and the loser replaces who is saved.
Not have one housemate deciding everything.