|
User banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
|
|
User banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
Its not about a poor child nor is it about anything other than the simple fact that KP chose a different and probably better route for her son over other less fortunate kids and she embellishes that choice by insisting on a driver and a nurse to accompany him and the tax payer stumps up. If she is getting more than others, she should be expected to pay her wack, not to expect the tax payer to bear the brunt of it just because she wants more and isn't willing to pay. Its not about how rich she is.
|