Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
No method is foolproof.
'Animals may suffer when stunning procedures fail. This
Regulation should therefore provide for appropriate
back-up stunning equipment to be available to
minimise pain, distress or suffering to the animals.'
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...99_2009_en.pdf |
I know the real reason
why you have posted the above, but what is your point? Are you claiming that because 'stunning' sometimes fails, that it justifies animals being slaughtered without stunning them?
A bit like saying that anesthesia has been known to sometimes fail so because it is not 'foolproof' , then any backstreet operations where rogue surgeons remove limbs from patients without any type of pain killers are justified.
It is better to support a well-intentioned system that seeks to protect animals about to be slaughtered from pain, than to try to use the occasional failure of such a system to defend systems without any protection at all. In my opinion.
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs