Thread: Katie Hopkins Katie Hopkins Worship = Moral Decay
View Single Post
Old 02-02-2015, 12:23 PM #66
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

[QUOTE=Jules2;7559229]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsmith78 View Post
Well I think this comment is kind of why people are relating with Katie Hopkins.

Because people don't like when disingenuous arguments are made not in a way to promote debate and opinions but to stifle it. By throwing around loaded terms to shut down a conversation.

I mean the example you use is the perfect example.

She believes in Isreal's bombing campaign.

As do many.

Why is that?

Because many think a coordinated bombing campaign is the only way. Because of Hamas's own less discriminate bombing campaign who deliberate target innocent women and children and also use their own women and children as human shield. Because the Hamas ideology is the extermination of all Jews.

This might be an argument you agree with, or disagree with. Because actually there is a genuine argument against.

However what you have chosen to do is go the easy route and shut down the argument because it's much easier to do that by throwing out loaded untruths like 'genocide', and 'hate crime'.

As with terms like 'sexism', 'racism' when they are used to quiet real debate however extreme or opposing an opinion might be most people in real life don't like it. Because not only is it insulting and irritating to the people who you oppose but it undermines and insults the people who you agree with.

And that's why people like Katie. Her opinions are often at the extreme ends of the spectrum for dramatic effect and as such fairly two dimensional and black and white. However her loaded terms are designed to encourage debate not shut it down. Whether I agree or disagree I like that.[/QUOTE]

That is a good point tbh, the trouble with many they are to patronising trying to keep in with everyone and as you say closing a debate down. Talking generally here. For the general public it is sometimes easier just to criticise and to ignore.

I can see the flip sides to everything said but then the two sides have to be weighed up, there is never ever a satisfactory answer to please everyone. I have never really looked into Katies remarks, only gone by that which others have said. I would say though there is always a wider picture and the picture which in the end gets best results and saves a man from drowning is obviously the right one. The trouble is we cannot save everyone, this is a very sad fact of life.
shes a a shallow bigot that's all she is.....she lacks every human quality
the truth is offline