[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by letmein

Snopes is not your friend, hon.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp

You copied and pasted most of this trash from Conservapedia, which is a far-Right Christian fundamentalist web site:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Obama's_Religion

Rational Wiki sums them up in a frank and funny way:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia

You should also research Conservapedia's so-called sources. Stop being lazy.

What???? Why are you acting as though you've just made the expose of the century. I already stated; "I have 28 pages on Obama and this very subject in my own files alone which are the result of researching and cross referencing internet articles, newspaper articles, and excerpts from 2 books (I’m currently writing a thriller novel ) I have found the usual articles which rebut some of which I post here, but after extensive past and recent cross checking, I'm inclined to believe this which I post.

Where do you learn information from? Serious question, and how would you post collated information from several different sources? When it comes to lists, apart from editing out any irrelevant parts, why would anyone try to rewrite them in their entirety? There are only so many words one can use.

Where is this lazy? Posting links is lazy.

I have read dozens of articles on this, and cross checked what I posted. I also stated that I have read the usual rebuttal articles too, but after evaluating what I'd read and watched, I believe what I've posted.

I tried to post links to the YouTube vids I watched, and I suppose you think they're fake as well? So why don't you post what you regard as the truth then, if you consider the information in my post is 'crap'?

Are you saying Obama wasn't and isn't a Muslim? Are you saying he didn't repeatedly lie about his Muslim faith and go to great lengths to conceal it? Are you saying that knowledge gleaned from a 'Right Wing Christian Website' is invalid just because it's a 'Right Wing Christian Website'?

I'd be really interested in seeing your evidence which rebuts the information which you dismiss as crap, so please post. I'd have more respect if you did, rather than you merely diving in to discredit without offering your version of the 'truth' - with corroboration.

In fact, why don't you take the lists in my post and address each point individually, stating why they're 'crap' and rebutting them with what you maintain is the truth?

I call sniping lazy - not the researching and collating of information from multiple sources.