View Single Post
Old 15-02-2015, 10:55 AM #12
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
I take it you're asking me...

These people break the law. Just because they're doing something we approve of by exposing paedophiles doesn't make them right legally. What if they decide they're going to expose something that threatens our national security, or threatens the safety of operatives working for national security? Lawlessness is not an answer.
I was up for this Livia at first, but actually thinking about it after reading your post, I have changed my mind.

You are right, you are absolutely right. The Law is the Law. It should be rigid and equitable and either apply to all, or be changed by due process.

As you say; it is wrong to approve breaking the law because of a 'the end justifies the means' mentality, and this 'Hacking' action is fraught with very real dangers - both to our individual liberties and our national security.

I was so eager to learn which political figures were on the list that I did not think it through.
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003)
.................................................. ..
Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs

kirklancaster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote