Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
I think it was an adequate sentence to act as a deterent in case others have the same idea. Don't think it was in any way harsh at all as the guy was intent on carrying out a barbaric terrorist offense. It was an intended act of treason which sets it apart from other crimes.
|
I totally agree. 'Deterrent' is the key word here and should be the joint prime consideration with 'Punishment' when sentencing, with B.S. 'Rehabilitation' or 'De-radicalising' a remote last.