Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
if he is guilty, then he should be penalized criminally and then deal with the job issue.
a violent assault is a serious crime. the criminal aspect should be dealt with first. the fact that BBC was sitting around worrying about whether or not he should be fired should be secondary to the fact that a man violently assaulted another man. but BBC decided his employment was more important than justice???
|
Erm, why is it one or the other?
They're both simultaneous. The BBC didn't stop anything. The BBC did what an employer is supposed to do and the police are doing what the police are supposed to do.
But you're clearly out to make some nonsensical parallel between this and the Saville stuff so carry on....