Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
Honestly Kirk you're as guilty of bias as any number of "lefties" (which is, by the way, an insulting and patronising slur) on here. There is a massive gulf between saying "there is a problem with immigration controls and it needs to be looked at" and stating that people from sub-saharran Africa are "savages who would rape and murder your family in a heartbeat" (reasoned or civil debate went out of the window right about there) . Or, for that matter, the comments of Ms Hopkins herself that they are "cockroaches" who deserve to be blown out of the water. But do you ever pick up on the latter comments and point out how ludicrous they are? No. Never. And yet you lambast others for "refusing to condemn" this, that and the other.
Also kirk... I honestly have to say... I don't see anyone on this forum consistently and determinedly posting as if they have a "monopoly on the truth" other than... Err... You. Even going so far as to state and congratulate how "intelligent" anyone who happens to agree with you must be (thereby inferring that anyone who does not is less intelligent, and presumably therefore more likely to be "wrong"). So I'll just flip it right back at you:
Just because our beliefs do not align with yours, does not make YOU right and US wrong.
This will continue to be the case, no matter how many "really really long posts" full of dubious, one-sided "facts" and supposed "evidence" you bellow at us.
|
First of all TS - I have never said that; "people from sub-saharran Africa are "savages who would rape and murder your family in a heartbeat"
Secondly, for you to state:
"Or, for that matter, the comments of Ms Hopkins herself that they are "cockroaches" who deserve to be blown out of the water.
But do you ever pick up on the latter comments and point out how ludicrous they are? No. Never. And yet you lambast others for "refusing to condemn" this, that and the other."
is utter nonsense and patently untrue:
A)
"It is terrible"
B) Originally Posted by joeysteele
JOEY STEELE'S POST: I just hate everything about this woman and all she claims to stand for, as for her outlet for her total nastiness,insulting and controversial tripe, she and the SUN are well suited to each other.[/B]
It is absolutely no surprise to me at all that publication prints her vile trash, since it is full of it itself in its own editorials.
I couldn't agree more Joey - but like Lily, I don't buy the Sun or ever listen, watch or read Hopkins, but also as Lily says,
as abhorrent and fake as it all is - Hopkins is entitled to her opinions.
C)
I have NO time for Katie Hopkins
D) Hopkins comments -
though offensive
E)
I had already stated several times that Hopkins was wrong and condemned her for it
F)
the imbecilic views of an attention seeker such as Katie Hopkins against immigrants,
G) LIVIA'S POST: "Why does anyone care what Hopkins has to say? She's a gobsh1te. Pre-Internet, d/ckheads like her would have to go to Speakers Corner to get an audience, now, they have the opportunity to spill their bile to a MASSIVE audience many of whom seem to be drinking in her nonsense. Here is another thread discussing what this woman thinks. I don't care... let me know when someone's topped her so I can avoid her "RIP" thread."
My response:
"I genuinely applaud what you say Liv"
How many more do you need? Now those condemnations are from just this thread, which is FAR MORE than I have ever witnessed YOU post on threads where innocents have been beheaded by IS, or where Hate Preachers have spouted incitements to violence, so you are WRONG to claim it is .
As for: "Also kirk... I honestly have to say... I don't see anyone on this forum consistently and determinedly posting as if they have a "monopoly on the truth" other than... Err... You. Even going so far as to state and congratulate how "intelligent" anyone who happens to agree with you must be (thereby inferring that anyone who does not is less intelligent, and presumably therefore more likely to be "wrong"). So I'll just flip it right back at you:"
I am one of the few on here who usually actually posts corroborating evidence to support what I write. So your contentions above are totally groundless.