Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
..I don't know what you mean by was it you/who made the thread, I have no idea, it was quite a while ago ..but the point of my mentioning it as an example is that judgements are made from people whatever their personal situation and most of those negative judgements even from people who would relate more closely to her...I think that feeling it's an 'I'm alright Jack' thing is equally taking a section of society and labelling them in a negative way, much like with 'scroungers' being referred to as a label from some....for many people it's less of an I'm alright Jack and more ...there but for the grace of good go I and many, may people do what they can and are able to...there still obviously is also charity and help organisations as well as there always was...and those are still going because people do care and there is empathy and they do want to give their time to actively do something....
..I personally don't believe that anyone on benefits should only have those to be on breadline and not be able to have some luxuries as well, whether it be for themselves or their children...because without those the stress factors become higher, which just creates more health issues and less likelihood of being able to work etc..
|
The study is based on attitudinal change, you can't really debate that without referring to attitudes, and that is just one...
I don't think the case for luxuries will be won, a warm secure home and food is the minimum requirement, that's all anyone truly needs to be able to attempt to lift themselves out of poverty initially, sadly that for many is a dream.