View Single Post
Old 13-05-2015, 01:42 PM #4
joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,054

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,054

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adamski94 View Post
This is BS as they don't what about people on zero hour contracts or those who have been sanctioned as there not accounted for
I have said for ages, the people that are on 16 hour contracts,(which is really only part time work),and that is actually what all the staff are on at my local Supermarket, except for Supervisors and dept; heads.

Also everyone on a zero hours contract, whether happy to be on one or not, should still be classed as not being in full time work at all and therefore not 'fully' employed.

So for me both the 'those in employment figures', and the current 'unemployed' figure are misleading.
Anyone not in full time work, in my view is not in full employment, and we should have that breakdown so better judgements can be made as to who is in good full time regular work and who is not.

I have been saying that for years.
joeysteele is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote