View Single Post
Old 27-05-2015, 10:41 PM #1
Jamesy Jamesy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 4,652

Favourites (more):
BB18: Raph
BB16: Nick
Jamesy Jamesy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 4,652

Favourites (more):
BB18: Raph
BB16: Nick
Default What they should have done

  • Whole house up for constant rule breaking.
  • Vote to save.
  • Three people with the lowest votes evicted.
  • Four new housemates (we lost Adjoa so she would be replaced and it would effectively be a new series).
  • Could have even thrown in a fifth new housemate to replace Mr Showbizzzz.
  • Then to balance that out have one or two double evictions throughout the series so it's not a crowded final.

My only concern about this eviction is that it's VTE and a quadruple eviction is treading on thin ice. It seems like the 4in4out idea has been rushed and created because they think it will sound big, exciting, dramatic and pull in new viewers. But in reality we could lose four good housemates when it could have been less. We don't know who these new housemates could be although it's pretty risky and I think will do more damage than good, especially when we have formed opinions and likes/dislikes from the 6 that are up for eviction.

The timing for this is terrible too. On the week of BGT live shows and prior to the BGT final on Sunday. BGT will dominate social media over the weekend and this big twist just won't get an eye in.

They should have left this twist for next week, when BGT is out the picture and TV is a little quieter, giving Big Brother time to spread on social media. They should have announced this twist next Monday and given 4 days for the news to spread. With two days left till the eviction and this twist there really isn't that much time for news to spread or new/old viewers to take an interest.
Jamesy is offline