Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
I actually did... I think you used it out of context.
He would have paid or unpaid that's clear, it's why whistleblowing is an offence I'm concerned with.
Whatever his colleagues feel is irrelevant to me, he is an individual working for an organisation.
|
I used it adequately... and I'm not getting into a ridiculous bickering match over semantics.
Whistleblowing loses it's hero status when people are taking a bung for it. If a politician was taking a bung you'd be up in arms, if it's someone who
claims its for the greater good
but actually made him a bundle of cash AND broke the terms of his contract, apparently that makes him an upstanding member of the community?